EORbenchmark
Europe-first benchmark
ENGet Matched
Comparison
Evidence-led comparisonGEO: Europe-firstLLMO-ready

Remote vs Lano

EU-first benchmark with structured evidence, conservative treatment of unknowns, and clear decision drivers.

EU verdict

No single EU champion in this pairing. Use the pillar breakdown to choose based on your highest-risk requirements.

Decision drivers
  • Remote leads on Payroll & Benefits Ops.
  • Lano leads on Coverage Quality.
  • Remote leads on Platform & Integrations.
  • Remote leads on Support & SLAs.
Remote
Global HR & EOR
Overall score
73
/ 100
Overall
Evidence 5Standard EU depthSOC 2 + ISO 2700190+ EOR countries
Lano
Global payroll and contractor management
Overall score
57
/ 100
Overall
Evidence 4Public pricing170+ countries
Evidence-first scoring; unknowns reduce confidence until verified.
Remote: No named independent EOR compliance certification in current evidence set.
Remote: Compliance evidence items: 0.
Lano: No named independent EOR compliance certification in current evidence set.
Lano: Compliance evidence items: 0.
Evidence-first scoring; unknowns reduce confidence until verified.
Remote: SSO not confirmed in current evidence set.
Remote: Integrations hub not confirmed in current evidence set.
Remote: API not confirmed in current evidence set.
Remote: RBAC not confirmed in current evidence set.
Remote: User-review signal present (G2/Capterra).
Remote: Platform evidence items: 0.
Lano: SSO not confirmed in current evidence set.
Lano: Integrations hub not confirmed in current evidence set.
Lano: API not confirmed in current evidence set.
Lano: RBAC not confirmed in current evidence set.
Lano: User-review signal present (G2/Capterra).
Lano: Platform evidence items: 0.
Evidence-first scoring; unknowns reduce confidence until verified.
Remote: ISO 27001 posture stated.
Remote: SOC 2 posture stated.
Remote: GDPR posture stated.
Remote: Security evidence items: 1.
Lano: ISO 27001 not confirmed in current evidence set.
Lano: SOC 2 not confirmed in current evidence set.
Lano: GDPR posture stated.
Lano: Security evidence items: 1.
Evidence highlights - Remote
  • pricing: Remote EOR pricing shown as $699 per employee/month and hiring without opening a local entity in 90+ countries.
  • security: Remote Trust Center lists SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR resources.
  • reviews: G2 review summary highlights ease of use and support; negatives include poor support, delays, missing features, and payment issues.
Evidence highlights - Lano
  • pricing: Lano pricing lists EOR at $599 per employee/month, contractors at $49 per month, and services in 170+ countries.
  • security: Lano trust page states GDPR compliance and data security practices.
  • reviews: G2 reviews highlight ease of use and compliance help; negatives mention limited reporting and payment issues.
Market signals - Remote
  • No verified market signal evidence logged yet.
Market signals - Lano
  • No verified market signal evidence logged yet.
FAQs
How do we score Remote vs Lano?
Scores are evidence-led and weighted across compliance, security, platform, support, and coverage. Unknowns are scored conservatively.
What matters most for EU hiring?
EU hiring favors compliance depth, local entity coverage, GDPR-aligned data protection, and clear onboarding workflows.
When should I choose each provider?
Choose the provider with stronger evidence in your critical pillars (compliance, security, platform), then validate country-specific coverage.