EORbenchmark
Europe-first benchmark
ENGet Matched
Comparison
EU benchmark leaderGEO: Europe-firstLLMO-ready

Remote Teams vs WorkMotion

EU-first benchmark with structured evidence, conservative treatment of unknowns, and clear decision drivers.

EU verdict

WorkMotion leads the EU benchmark on compliance depth and evidence coverage in this snapshot.

Key evidence highlights include compliance certifications, GDPR posture, and onboarding benchmarks (see evidence log).

Remote Teams remains competitive in select pillars but lacks equivalent evidence in EU-first areas.

Europe-first DepthCompliance Proof Tier AEU benchmark leaderIEC Gold certifiedEU Data Protection + ISO 27001 + GDPR
Decision drivers
  • WorkMotion leads on Compliance & Legal Depth.
  • WorkMotion leads on Coverage Quality.
  • WorkMotion leads on Platform & Integrations.
  • WorkMotion leads on Support & SLAs.
Remote Teams
Remote staffing/contractor-of-record; EOR coverage not stated
Overall score
45
/ 100
Overall
Evidence 2
WorkMotion
Europe-first EOR benchmark leader
Overall score
88
/ 100
Overall
Evidence 15Europe-first DepthCompliance Proof Tier AEU benchmark leaderIEC Gold certifiedEU Data Protection + ISO 27001 + GDPR
Evidence-first scoring; unknowns reduce confidence until verified.
Remote Teams: No named independent EOR compliance certification in current evidence set.
Remote Teams: Compliance evidence items: 0.
WorkMotion: Independent EOR compliance certification present (IEC Gold).
WorkMotion: Compliance evidence items: 2.
Evidence-first scoring; unknowns reduce confidence until verified.
Remote Teams: SSO not confirmed in current evidence set.
Remote Teams: Integrations hub not confirmed in current evidence set.
Remote Teams: API not confirmed in current evidence set.
Remote Teams: RBAC not confirmed in current evidence set.
Remote Teams: Platform evidence items: 0.
WorkMotion: SSO evidenced.
WorkMotion: Integrations hub evidenced.
WorkMotion: API evidenced.
WorkMotion: RBAC evidenced.
WorkMotion: User-review signal present (G2/Capterra).
WorkMotion: Platform evidence items: 3.
WorkMotion: Platform score override applied: 90.
Evidence-first scoring; unknowns reduce confidence until verified.
Remote Teams: ISO 27001 not confirmed in current evidence set.
Remote Teams: SOC 2 not confirmed in current evidence set.
Remote Teams: GDPR posture not clearly evidenced in this snapshot.
Remote Teams: Security evidence items: 0.
WorkMotion: ISO 27001 posture stated.
WorkMotion: SOC 2 not confirmed in current evidence set.
WorkMotion: GDPR posture stated.
WorkMotion: Security evidence items: 4.
Evidence highlights - Remote Teams
  • market: Domain shows a parked or for-sale page; no public EOR offering verified.
  • coverage: MyRemoteTeams describes remote team staffing and contractor-of-record positioning; no explicit EOR coverage claims in homepage copy.
Evidence highlights - WorkMotion
  • pricing: EOR pricing starting at EUR 499 per talent/month and 160+ country claim.
  • compliance: WorkMotion claims first and only EOR with IEC Gold certification (IEC Group audit).
  • onboarding: Onboarding in less than 10 minutes (accelerated onboarding page).
Market signals - Remote Teams
  • Domain shows a parked or for-sale page; no public EOR offering verified.
Market signals - WorkMotion
  • No verified market signal evidence logged yet.
FAQs
How do we score Remote Teams vs WorkMotion?
Scores are evidence-led and weighted across compliance, security, platform, support, and coverage. Unknowns are scored conservatively.
What matters most for EU hiring?
EU hiring favors compliance depth, local entity coverage, GDPR-aligned data protection, and clear onboarding workflows.
When should I choose each provider?
Choose the provider with stronger evidence in your critical pillars (compliance, security, platform), then validate country-specific coverage.